Nursing

Do you want a similar paper? Click here to get it from our professional writers!

Assessment  2 – Essay

 

Assessment Title Essay
Task Description NSW Health and private employers promote values and value statements pertinent to their organisation. Whether we agree with them or not, when we work within that organisation, we need to ensure our personal values will not be compromised by our employer.

Consider your personal values espoused in your collage (from week 1).
Reflect on these values and analyse how they sit within the values advocated by NSW Health.
How do the values set out by NSW Health impact and influence teams within healthcare?
How can leaders within health live these values and make them meaningful to teams and patients?
Considering these things, what do you need to do to prepare yourself for practice next year?

Assessment Due date Monday 25 th September, 23:55hrs
Return Date to Students Following declaration of results to students 30th November 2017
Weighting 50%
Length 2,500 Words
Assessment Criteria Your assignment will be evaluated on the following assessment criteria:
Content (70%)
Adheres to school requirements with regard to presentation, referencing and word limit (30%)
Referencing Style Author – Date (Harvard)

 

Submission Your report will be submitted into a Turnitin submission box within the SNPG903 Moodle site. You will have the opportunity to review and re-submit your assignment up to the due date and time.

To learn more about how to use Turnitin please access the resources at the following link:

Subject Learning Outcomes Assessed 4,5,6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessment 2: Essay Marking Guide

Name:  ………………………………………………………………. Student No.: ………………………………….

Criteria  

Fail

Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction Marks
Content (70%)
Using the literature critically analyse what makes a health care team effective and how your personal

values allow you to be an effective member of that team

 

0-7 7.5-9 9.5-11 11.5-13 13.5-15 /15
Discuss how leaders use values to  develop an effective health care team 0-7 7.5-9 9.5-11 11.5-13 13.5-15 /15
Reflecting on NSW Health’s CORE values  and the literature demonstrate  how the values of healthcare team members impact on patient outcomes and experiences 0-9.5 10-12 12.5-14.5 15-17 17.5-20 /20
Use a reflective model (what, so what and now what ) and literature to reflect on how you will continue to develop yourself as a healthcare professional and how this will benefit you in your future career path. 0-9.5 10-12 12.5-14.5 15-17 17.5-20 /20
Adheres to school requirements with regard to presentation, referencing and word limit (30%)
§   Assignment logically developed and clearly constructed, with Introduction, body of work, conclusion, Adheres to the word limit

§   Evidence of linkage and integration of information

§   Appropriate use of academic language, Assignment is easy to read, It catches the reader’s attention and promotes the conveying of information

§   Objective and authentic writing style

0-2

0-2

0-2

0-2

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

3-3.5

3-3.5

3-3.5

3-3.5

4

4

4

4

4.5-5

4.5-5

4.5-5

4.5-5

/20
§   Syntax, grammar, punctuation and spelling are correct

§   Integrated use of references, referencing as per School guidelines

0-2

0-2

0-2

0-2

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

3-3.5

3-3.5

3-3.5

3-3.5

4

4

4

4

4.5-5

4.5-5

4.5-5

4.5-5

/10

This assignment is worth 50% of the total assessment for this subject.

/100

Assessment 2 – Marking Rubric

 

  Performance Indicators        
Criteria Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction Mark
Content (70%)

 

Criterion 1

 

Ability to relate literature on health care team effectiveness and personal values

(0-7)

 

Inadequately uses the literature to describe what makes a health care team effective. Inadequate analyses of how personal values allow an individual to be an effective member of that team

 

(7.5-9)

Uses some literature to describe what makes a health care team effective. Describes how personal values allow an individual to be an effective member of that team

 

(9.5-11)

Uses the literature to critically analyse what makes a health care team effective. Critically analyses how personal values allow an individual to be an effective member of that team

 

 (11.5-13)

 

Comprehensive use of the literature to critically analyse what makes a health care team effective. Critically analyses literature to demonstrate understanding of how personal values allow an individual to be an effective member of that team

 

(13.5-15)

 

Comprehensive and insightful use of contemporary literature to critically analyse what makes a health care team effective. Synthesis of literature that demonstrates critical  analyses and understanding of how personal values allow an individual to be an effective member of that team

/15
Criterion 2

 

Ability to apply literature on health care team effectiveness and personal values

(0-7)

Inadequate discussion on how leaders use values to develop an effective health care team. Inadequate understanding of the role of values and the meaning of effective health care teams demonstrated

(7.5-9)

Some discussion on how leaders use values to develop an effective health care team. Some understanding of the role of values and the meaning of effective health care teams demonstrated

 

(9.5-11)

 

Discuss how leaders use values to  develop an effective health care team

 (11.5-13)

 

Academic and informed discussion on how leaders use values to develop an effective health care team. Discussion demonstrates good understanding of the role of values and the meaning of effective health care teams

(13.5-15)

 

Highly developed academic and informed discussion on how leaders use values to develop an effective health care team. Discussion demonstrates deep understanding of the role of values and

the meaning of effective health care teams

 

/15
Criterion 3

 

Analysis relationship between NSW Health values and patient outcomes

(1-9.5)

Inadequate consideration on NSW Health’s CORE values and the literature. Inadequate demonstration of how the values of healthcare team members impact on patient outcomes and experiences

(10-12)

Some evidence of reflecting on NSW Health’s CORE values  and the literature describes how some of the values of healthcare team members impact on patient outcomes and experiences

(12.5-14.5)

 

Reflecting on NSW Health’s CORE values  and the literature demonstrate  how the values of healthcare team members impact on patient outcomes and experiences

 

 (15-17)

 

Reflecting on NSW Health’s CORE values  and the literature provide a thoughtful portrayal how the values of healthcare team members impact on patient outcomes and experiences

(17.5-20)

 

Reflecting on NSW Health’s CORE values  and the literature provide a comprehensive and thoughtful portrayal of how the values of healthcare team members impact on patient outcomes and experiences

/20
Criterion 4

 

Reflection on the impact of this on individual development

(1-9.5)

Does not use a reflective model and/or literature to reflect on how you will continue to develop yourself as a healthcare professional and how this will benefit you in your future career path.

(10-12)

Insufficient evidence of use of reflective model and/or literature to reflect on how you will continue to develop yourself as a healthcare professional and how this will benefit you in your future career path.

(12.5-14.5)

Use a reflective model and literature to reflect on how you will continue to develop yourself as a healthcare professional and how this will benefit you in your future career path.

 

(15-17)

 

Accurate use of a reflective model and literature to reflect on how you will continue to develop yourself as a healthcare professional and how this will benefit you in your future career path.

(17.5-20)

 

Accurate and thoughtful use of a reflective model and current academic literature to reflect on

how you will continue to develop yourself as a healthcare professional and how this will benefit you in your future career path.

/20
Adheres to school requirements with regard to presentation, referencing and word limit (30%)

 

Criterion 5

 

Argument development and construction, academic writing skill, word limit adherence

(0-2)

Assignment is not logically developed or not clearly constructed, Introduction, body of work, conclusion are not evident. Does not adhere to the word limit

 

(2.5)

 

Assignment satisfactorily developed and demonstrates basic construction of introduction, body of work, conclusion, Adheres to the word limit

 

(3-3.5)

 

Assignment logically developed and clearly constructed, Introduction, body of work, conclusion, Adheres to the word limit

 

(4)

 

Assignment is comprehensive and logically developed. It is clearly constructed, demonstrating good use of the introduction, body of work, & conclusion. Demonstrates good academic writing skills. Adheres to the word limit

(4.5-5)

 

Assignment is comprehensive and logically developed. It is thoughtfully and accurately constructed. Introduction, body of work, & conclusion demonstrate excellent academic writing skills. Adheres to the word limit

 

 

 

/5

Criterion 6

 

Information integration and linkage; reasoning, analysis and synthesis of ideas

(0-2)

No evidence of linkage and integration of information

 

(2.5)

 

Adequate evidence of linkage and integration of information

 

(3-3.5)

Evidence of linkage and integration of information. Some analysis.

 

(4)

 

Evidence of linkage and integration of information. Demonstrates reasoning and analysis of ideas.

 

(4.5-5)

 

Clear evidence of linkage and integration of information. Demonstrates reasoning, analysis and synthesis of ideas.

 

 

 

/5

Criterion 7

 

Academic language style and effect on communication of information

 

(0-2)

 

Evidence of colloquial/conversational language. Assignment is difficult  to read, difficult to follow and does not promote the conveying of information

(2.5)

 

Adequate use of appropriate use of academic language evident. Assignment does not flow well to the reader, and promotes the conveying of only some information

(3-3.5)

 

Appropriate use of academic language, Assignment is easy to read, It catches the reader’s attention and promotes the conveying of information

(4)

 

Well-developed academic language. Assignment is easy to read, It catches the reader’s attention and promotes the conveying of information

(4.5-5)

 

Highly developed academic language. Assignment is easy to read, It catches the reader’s attention and clearly and concisely promotes the conveying of information

 

 

 

 

/5

Criterion 8

 

Writing style enhances authenticity and originality

 

(0-2)

 

Writing style lacks objective and authentic language.

(2.5)

 

Satisfactorily objective and authentic language at times.

(3-3.5)

 

Objective and authentic writing style

 

(4)

 

Accurate and objective writing style that demonstrates authenticity of language

 

(4.5-5)

 

Academic, accurate and objective writing style that demonstrates authenticity of language and originality in style.

 

 

 

/5

Criterion 9

 

Writing Syntax, grammar, punctuation and spelling

(0-2)

 

Syntax, grammar, punctuation and spelling are incorrect

 

(2.5)

 

Syntax, grammar, punctuation and spelling are of an acceptable standard. .

 

(3-3.5)

 

Syntax, grammar, punctuation and spelling are correct and of a good standard.

 

(4)

 

Syntax, grammar, punctuation and spelling are correct and of a very good standard.

 

(4.5-5)

 

Syntax, grammar, punctuation and spelling are correct and of a high and academic standard.

 

 

 

 

/5

Criterion 10

 

Referencing style and use

(0-2)

 

References not integrated and  referencing not as per School guidelines

(2.5)

 

Satisfactorily integrated use of references, referencing. Adequate use of referencing per School guidelines

(3-3.5)

Good integrated use of references, referencing as per School guidelines

 

 

(4)

 

Referencing demonstrates very good understanding of the relevant academic literature.

Referencing as per School guidelines

(4.5-5)

 

Referencing demonstrates excellent understanding of the relevant academic literature. Referencing as per School guidelines

 

 

 

/5

Total

 

/100

Assessment 2 – Marking Rubric (continued)

Do you want a similar paper? Click here to get it from our professional writers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *