COIT20249 Assessment Details

Hii Sir/Mam,I caught last time under plagiarism on this subject so i have taken this subject again in this
term. For this assignment I want unique idea report. as per the specification, there is mention i need to use
more than 10 references in which 7 out of 10 must be academic. can you provide me some research that
you have carried out while making this report.
COIT20249 Assessment Details
Assessment item 3—Report
Due date: 11.55 pm AEST, Friday, Week 10 ASSESSMENT
Weighting: 40%
Length: 2500 words +/- 250 words 3
Objectives
Please refer to the Unit Profile to see how this assessment item relates to the Unit Learning Outcomes.
This assignment is designed to stimulate critical thinking outside of the classroom by requiring students to
write a formal academic report. You will need to follow the ARE process described in chapters 2 and 3 of
Your Business Degree 2 (prescribed textbook for COIT20249) to analyse the assessment task, research
relevant information and evaluate the information you find. This information should be used to write an
academic report in which you present your findings or outcomes and make recommendations for future
practice. Professional writing and writing reports are described in chapters 4 and 5 of Your Business
Degree 2. This assessment task will assess your skills in critical thinking, researching information,
forming an opinion, academic writing, logical ordering of ideas and your ability to support your arguments
with quotes from literature. These objectives will be measured by the ‘closeness of fit’ to meeting the
assessment task, assessment requirements and marking criteria.

• Questionnaire design for the project:

• Questionnaire design for the project:
-Servicescape, empathy, authenticity perception, and dining experience influence customer future
behavioural intention in the context of boutique restaurants in Melbourne.-
• A minimum of 10 and a maximum of 20 questions
• Use a mix of open and closed question formats.
• At least, one of your questions must employ a replicable scale
• Write a brief 1000 word report explaining the structure of the questionnaire and the steps your group
took in designing it to address the management problem.

Data File: Superstoresales T2 2019.xlsx Scenario You work as a report developer and analyst for Super Store. Your manager has supplied you with some data related to sales and has requested a number of reports.

Reporting Assignment
Date Due: Week 7
Assessment Percentage: 35%
Groups: 2
Data File: Superstoresales T2 2019.xlsx
Scenario
You work as a report developer and analyst for Super Store. Your manager has supplied you with some
data related to sales and has requested a number of reports. You task, with a partner, is to create the
required reports to answer each of the questions below.
You have been requested to use Microsoft PowerBI to analyse the data. Once you have created the
required reports you will need to record the answer and insert a screen shot of the report with the answer
highlighted, (in the area below). Each screen shot should include the student IDs. Your manager has also
asked you to interpret the data and provide an explanation for the results for certain questions.
The footer must include the group member’s name and student ID.
You need to create a save a separate report for each question.
Name your file for assignment 1 in the form Student ID1 Student ID2.pdf. You must upload a copy of the
assignment to Blackboard.
Question: 1. What is the overall Sales reven

BUS5AP Analytics in Practice Visualisation and storytelling

BUS5AP Analytics in Practice
Visualisation and storytelling
Good storytelling requires that our visuals are done properly. By that, it means that the visual is conveying
facts correctly and is itself factual, and it does deliver the intended message to the audience. This is
increasingly becoming important among employers and in some instances, visualisation questions are part
of the interview process to ascertain your suitability as a data scientist hire.
In interview scenarios, the common kind of ‘test’ comes in the form of (i) asking you to comment on an
existing/given visualisation or (ii) asking you to walk them through the process of graphing a small data
set. The aim is to ensure that you not only understand analytics but also the art of communicating that to
stakeholders effectively.
In this assignment, you will be asked to undertake three tasks related to the above.
Tasks
1. The figure below is taken from a repository of “bad visualisations”.
• Comment what is wrong with this visual.
• Provide a visual to show how you would improve it.
2. You have been given a small data file containing different brands of cereals and their nutritional
information. This file was provided to you by Kelloggs, which you can download from the LMS.
Kelloggs has asked you to produce suitable visualisation(s) and to suggest a narrative that will position
Kelloggs’ products as one of the best to consider compared to the competitors.
• The various columns are self-explanatory except for Manufacturer, where the codes are as follows: G =

Establishing a Goal with Desired Outcomes HOW TO DEVELOP A GOAL OF CARE

Establishing a Goal with Desired Outcomes
HOW TO DEVELOP A GOAL OF CARE
A desired goal / outcomes serve the following purposes:
• Provide direction for planning nursing interventions
• Serve as a criteria for evaluating a person’s progress
• Provide a point of motivation
Goals can be for either short term or long term and need to be directly related to the nursing diagnosis.
They also should specify both an action and timeframe,
Goals and desired outcomes should be specific, measurable and written in terms of the person’s
responses/behaviour (not the nurses). They also need to be realistic for the person.
1
21/08/2019
Developing Interventions
HOW TO DETERMINE A COURE OF ACTION TO MEET THE SET GOAL
Interventions refer to the ‘take action’ phase of the CRC and may include a combination of cognitive
(thinking), interpersonal (communicating verbally and non-verbally) and technical (hands on) skills
Interventions need to be:
• linked to nursing diagnosis and goal/desired outcomes
• based on evidence (and align with policy and/or legislation)

Brighton Materials 4 ABP Abacus Property Group Units/ Stapled Securities Real Estate

Brighton Materials
4 ABP Abacus Property Group Units/ Stapled Securities Real Estate
5 AGL AGL Energy Limited Utilities
6 AHG Automotive Holdings Consumer Discretionary
7 AHY Asaleo Care Limited Consumer Staples
8 ALL Aristocrat Leisure Consumer Discretionary
9 ALQ Als Limited Industrials
10 ALU Altium Limited Information Technology
11 AMC Amcor Limited Materials
12 AMP AMP Limited Financials
13 ANN Ansell Limited Health Care
14 ANZ ANZ Banking Group Limited Financials
15 AOG Aveo Group Ordinary/Units FP Stapled Securities Real Estate
16 APA APA Group Units FP Stapled Securities Utilities
17 API Australian Pharm Health Care
18 APO Apn Outdoor Group Consumer Discretionary
19 ARB ARB Corporation Consumer Discretionary
20 ASL Ausdrill Limited Materials
21 AST Ausnet Services Limited Utilities
22 ASX ASX Limited Financials
23 AWC Alumina Limited Materials

Purpose -This assessment aims to develop your ability to evaluate, interpret and use high quality quantitative evidence in your practice.

Assessment 1 – Written Assessment 1
Assessment Type Written Assignment
Purpose -This assessment aims to develop your ability to evaluate, interpret and use high quality
quantitative evidence in your practice.
Description – You are required to write a summary of a specified Cochrane Review that relates to one of
the specified health issues covered in this course.
The Cochrane Reviews, Marking Algorithm and other relevant details can be found under the
‘Assessment’ tab on the NURS2201 Blackboard site.
This assessment requires you to provide a commentary on a Cochrane Review. Cochrane Nursing Care
Field (CNCF) ‘Cochrane Corners’ are a summary of an original Cochrane Review written by nurses for
nurses to highlight the relevance for nursing practice. If you would like more information about CNCF
‘Cochrane Corners’ go to: http://cncf.cochrane.org/evidence-transfer-program-review-summaries
Assessment Requirements:
1. Submit Draft – The draft aims to encourage you to start your assessment early. The draft must contain a
reasonable amount of relevant content and demonstrate genuine progress. There will be no written
feedback provided on the draft but there will be dedicated time to discuss your draft with tutors during
tutorials. The draft is worth up to 5 marks.
2. NMBA Registered Nurse Standards for Practice
Identify two NMBA Registered Nurse Standards for Practice that align with this assessment and briefly
explain why each of these standards is important to nursing practice (approx. 150 words)

BUS707 – Applied Business Research

ASSESSMENT 4
BUS707 – Applied Business Research
T2 2019
ASSESSMENT 4: Research Proposal – 50%
This assessment is designed to allow students to present and justify appropriate method(s) for a research
project designed to address the research question posed. This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes a,
b and d.
There are two components of the assessment:
• Written proposal: 40%
• Oral presentation: 10%
Based on the Research Question developed in Assessment 2, students should develop a research design
aimed at providing insights and/or answers to the question. Students should make any recommended
adjustments to the content of Assessment 2, based on feedback provided, prior to including it in
Assessment 4.
This assessment requires students to choose and justify the most appropriate research design, clearly
explaining WHY the chosen design will best answer the research question and is most appropriate in the
specific circumstances. Students should clearly justify their recommended research and analysis methods.
Note: Other than in exceptional circumstances, Assessment 4 of this subject is intended to form the basis
of the student’s Research Project in BUS710 Research Project, following appropriate adjustments
recommended in feedback
Written Proposal : the proposal will contain the following information :

Strategic Information Systems for Business and Enterprise

HOLMES INSTITUTE
FACULTY OF
HIGHER EDUCATION
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester T2 2019
Unit Code HI5019
Unit Title Strategic Information Systems for Business and Enterprise
Assessment Type Group assignment
Assessment Title Case Study – Gracious Industries
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO
Mapping) Students are required to:
• Appreciate the purpose of computer controls and auditing in digital economy (ULO 6)
• Describe the processes use in the development of computer-based systems/ERP and the ways in which
processes are managed (ULO 7)
Weight 20% of the total assessments
Total Marks 20
Word limit Not more than 3,500 words
Due Date Week 10, Friday 5:00 pm (AEST)
Submission Guidelines • This assignment is to be completed by a group of 3 – 5 students.
• Students must report the names

MRKT20052 Assessment 2: Marketing Plan

MRKT20052 Assessment 2: Marketing Plan
Weight: 40%
Word limit: 2,500 words
Week due: Week 9
Due date and time: 20th September (Friday) 11:55PM AEST
Students are required to choose ONE of four businesses/products. This assessment requires students to
work individually on their selected business/product to create a comprehensive strategic marketing plan
with a maximum word limit of 2,500 (excluding references). Your assessment should be an application of
relevant marketing concepts learnt in the unit. There is no need to go into details about explaining
marketing concepts, rather it should be an applied discussion (i.e. do not provide definitions and
descriptions of relevant concepts, instead you are required to apply those to your selected
business/product; you will be assessed on the quality of your conducted analysis).
Please upload the assessment through the appropriate Moodle submission link. Each assessment must be
uploaded as a .doc or .docx file (word file). Use APA Referencing style.
Any assessment with ‘Turnitin’ similarity score of more than 25% will be checked by the marker for
plagiarism although it may no necessarily man that you have plagiarised. If there is a substantial similarity
score in your ‘Turnitin’ report, your assessment will be investigated for plagiarism and could be forwarded