Signature Assignment The Signature Assignment will be 8-10 page (excluding cover page and references) and include a minimum of 4 sources from the Touro library.

Signature Assignment
The Signature Assignment will be 8-10 page (excluding cover page
and references) and include a minimum of 4 sources from the Touro
library.
This paper will focus on the health condition of high blood pressure.
In this scenario, this is due to a variety of behaviors, some of which
include: lack of exercise, high sodium intake/frequent fast food intake,
heavy alcohol consumption, lack of sleep, high stress, etc. Discuss
how 4 theories or topics covered between Modules 1-8 can be applied
to changing and improving this condition and changing the behaviors
that are contributing to high blood pressure. Be sure to include all
elements/constructs of each theory and topic. As with the Case
Assignment, these theories apply differently from person to person
and depend on individual circumstances, so discuss hypothetical
scenarios when necessary. You do not need to apply all behaviors
(lack of exercise, high sodium intake/frequent fast food intake, heavy
alcohol consumption, lack of sleep, high stress, etc.) to each theory,
just 4 theories to at least one behavior.
Prospect Theory
Bounded Rationality
Overconfidence Effect
Motivation for Change
Cognitive Dissonance
Habit Formation
Self-Control Capacity
Health Belief Model
1 / 2
Writing Guidelines
Essay must be double-spaced with 1-inch margins and typed in
12-point Times New Roman.
Your paper should have a title page and references page (not
included in the 8-10 page total count).
Essays should be proofread for spelling and grammar
mistakes.
You must cite all texts used, including page numbers to avoid
plagiarism.
Make sure your paper has an introduction (with purpose
statement), main points in the body of the paper, and an overall
conclusion section.
Build support in your paper with background material including
library sources that use the terms we discussed throughout the
course/program (Use at least 4 sources from the Touro library)
APA format
Note: If you do not turn in your Signature Assignment before the
deadline, points may be deducted from your score. If you anticipate a
problem turning in your assignment on time, PLEASE email me in
advance. I look forward to reading your paper!
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
2 / 2

Discussion with replies to two peers. Once you give me the initial post, I can get the replies for you to respond to.

Please complete separately part one and two
Discussion with replies to two peers. Once you give me the initial post, I can get the replies for you to respond to.
Part one discussion and two replies
Title: Positioning: Assessment Through The Customer Lens
Are you especially loyal to any one brand? If so, what is it and why are you so loyal?
When successfully building loyalty and community, trust seems to be the biggest factor. How can a company build trust? Should consumers trust companies? Why or why not? Do you think some consumers are just more prone to be loyal to companies and other consumers are not? Why or why not? Discuss the meaning of perceptions of quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Part 2, essay format apa,
Positioning: Assessment Through the Customer Lens Internet Exercise
SOMAR, The European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research, was founded in 1947. It is a nonprofit association for marketing research professional. ESOMAR promotes the use of opinion and marketing research to improve marketing decisions in companies worldwide and works to protect personal privacy in the research process. Visit The association’s website at www.esomar.org
1. How can ESOMAR help marketing professionals conduct research to guide marketing strategy?
2. How can ESOMAR help marketers to protect the privacy of research subjects when conducting marketing research in other countries?
3. ESOMAR introduced the first professional code of conduct for marketing research professionals in 1947. The association continues to update the document to address new technology and other changes in the marketing environment. According to ESOMAR’s code, what are the specific professional responsibilities of marketing researchers?

POS 4734 Research Methods in Political Science

Name:
POS 4734 Research Methods in Political Science
September 27, 2019
Research Proposal
KEEP IN MIND:
• For your research question, literature review, theoretical framework, and concept definitions, make sure to pay very close attention to the feedback you received and revise your previous drafts accordingly. Do NOT simply copy and paste from your previous drafts.
• If you provide more information on your methodology plan, you can receive more detailed feedback on it.
• The expected results do not need to be long. One or two paragraph(s) would be enough to show what is your prediction in the research.
• Citation is essential. You can choose any type of citation: MLA, APA, Chicago, or Harvard
• The deadline is October 4, 2019 at 11:59 PM
• This assignment should be submitted through the UF E-Learning (Canvas)
• It should be saved in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) or PDF
• It should be written with double-spaced, 12-point font, and 1-inch margins in 10-12 pages
EXPECTED STRUCTURE OF YOUR RESEARCH PROPOSAL:
1. Research question
What is your research question? Explain why your research question is important in the realm of political science and how it can contribute to the field.
2. Literature Review
Provide at least 3 academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to your research question. When you design your literature review, make sure to answer these questions:
• What questions have the scholarly articles addressed?
• What are the main arguments of the articles?
• How solid are the evidences provided in the articles to reach their conclusions?
• What are the points of convergence and disagreement in the literature?
• What are the most important problems and gaps that require further research?
3. Theoretical framework (Revising your previous draft)
• Theory
What is your theoretical answer to your research question? What is the logical reasoning behind your theoretical answer? Why is your theory better than other rival theories?
• Independent Variable
What is your independent variable? Define the concept of your independent variable. Do you adopt the concept built upon the literature? If so, explain why you adopt the concept. If not, explain how your concept is different from the literature’s.
If you have more than one independent variable, explain each variable in order.
• Dependent Variable
What is your dependent variable? Define the concept of your dependent variable. Do you adopt the concept built upon the literature? If so, explain why you adopt the concept. If not, explain how your concept is different from the literature’s.
• Hypotheses
Provide your hypotheses. When you build your hypotheses, make sure to check the qualifications of good hypotheses.
□ Empirical statement
□ Generality based on the scope of your research
□ Plausibility
□ Directional hypotheses
□ Correspondence to the way in which you intend to test the hypothesis
□ Testability
□ No tautology
• Explaining your theory: Why your theory answers to the research question?
• Defining concepts of your dependent and independent variables
• Explaining the assumptions underlying your theory
• Explaining the scope of your research: This part is NEW. Make sure to explain your scope condition
• Introducing your hypotheses
4. Research methodology
• Describing your dataset
o Who/when has created the dataset?
o How did you obtain it?
o What kind of information it has?
o Why do you use the dataset?
• Operationalization of your dependent and independent variables
o How to measure your dependent and independent variables?
o How to check validity and reliability? (if these criteria can be applicable)
• Unit of analysis
• Specific methodology you plan to use: Statistical analysis? Case studies? In-depth interview? Survey? Experiment?
• Why do you use the methodology? How do you choose your methodology?
5. Expected results

Write a 525- to 700-word paper evaluating the advertisements you selected and how they are effective or ineffective in their design.

Assignment Content
Open your web browser and search for recent health care advertisements from similar health care services, facilities, or other health sector-related occupations (e.g., labor supply, productivity improvement, technology, or personnel benefit design).
Select three advertisements and deconstruct each one to evaluate the marketing strategies employed.
Write a 525- to 700-word paper evaluating the advertisements you selected and how they are effective or ineffective in their design.
Consider the following when writing your paper:
Trade-offs
Personal cost
Incentives
Open trade
Marketing strategy(s) employed
Targeted demographics
Value exchange
“Five Cs” framework
Cite at least 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websit

The assignment is to write a reaction paper on the following statement: “A person who knows only one country basically knows no country well" (S.M. Lipset)

The assignment is to write a reaction paper on the following statement:
“A person who knows only one country basically knows no country well” (S.M. Lipset)
I am supposed to:
1. Clearly define the issue addressed in the statement
2. Clearly state your position on the issue (agree or disagree)
3. Defend your position
a. identify important arguments needed to support your position
b. use examples to support your argument when necessary
4. Conclude concisely
The paper should be about 3 pages long and should include at least 5 outside sources with parenthetical citations.

Part IA: Identification of Terms

Part IA: Identification of Terms (10 points each)
Identify fully FIVE terms of the following terms in a concise paragraph format (no bullets!) which must contain at least five sentences. Make sure to include specification of “who, what, when, where, and why significant” in your descriptions.
Part IA: General Terms (PICK FIVE)
John Adams James Madison
Virginia and New Jersey Plan Constitution of 1787 Federalists Bill of Rights
Election of 1800 Burr-Hamilton Duel
Part II: Essay (50 points)
For this portion respond to ONE of the following questions with a clear, well-reasoned essay that supports a thesis. Be sure to include specific reasons and details to support and illustrate each point you make.
The original agreement which governed the newly independent American colonies was the Articles of Confederation. Drawing from your text and lecture notes, write an essay examining the provisions for the Articles of Confederation. How did both large and small states feel about their government representation? What were the strengths and weaknesses of this government? Finally, analyze the uprising which led the founding fathers toward drafting a permanent constitution. Be sure to include specific details.
Lewis and Clark’s Expedition paved the way for westward expansion. The Expedition’s diversity contributed to its success. Drawing from your text and your lecture notes, write an essay in which you discuss the Lewis and Clark’s Expedition. Explain how the United States acquired the Louisiana Purchase. Discuss the various members and the contributions they brought to the Expedition. What were the goals of the Expedition, and was it successful? As always, be sure to address who, what, when, where, and why an event or a person was important. Be sure to include specific details.
Zinn book
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/zinnapeopleshistory.html

The Glass Menagerie by Tennessee Williams

The Glass Menagerie by Tennessee Williams
https://www.pval.org/cms/lib/NY19000481/Centricity/Domain/105/the_glass_menagerie_messy_full_text.pdf
Essay = 4/5 paragraphs, at least 4 or more sentences for each paragraph
Discuss the symbol of the glass menagerie. What does it represent? Does it represent the same things throughout the play, or does its meaning change?

HIST 348 – Debating Truth Quiz

HIST 348 – Debating Truth Quiz Name:
Convince your instructor that you read the chapter carefully by answering the questions below.
1. How was Spain different, compared to the traditional stereotype of medieval society?
2. How does Debating Truth explain the term convivencia?
3. What was the Kingdom/Crown of Aragon and what were its origins?
4. What was the Reconquista, according to Debating Truth?
5. Who were the mudéjares and how were they treated under Christian rule?
6. Write a brief (4-5 sentence) biography of King James I the Conqueror. At least one sentence should be devoted to his record keeping practices and how they compared to earlier monarchs.
7. What role did Jews play in James I’s approach to controlling and governing his kingdom?
8. Who were Hasdai ibn Shaprut and Samuel ha-Nagid and what do they tell us about Jewish life in Al-Andalus?
9. How did Jewish life in Al-Andalus change following the arrival of the Almoravids and the Almohads? (Hint: The exiles of Judah ha-Levi, Petrus Alfonsi, and Maimonides are useful here.)
10. What role did “disputation” (oral & literary debate) play in university and intellectual life in medieval Spain?

How did radio help change people’s leisure time? How did the transistor help change the way people listen to radio? What do you think Alan Freed’s biggest contribution to radio was, and why?

check the link before you start :
https://com130rockandroll.wordpress.com/2019/10/05/post-5-week-of-march-5-turn-up-the-radio/#comments
How did radio help change people’s leisure time? How did the transistor help change the way people listen to radio? What do you think Alan Freed’s biggest contribution to radio was, and why?
Other than no advertising, what is the biggest difference between commercial and non-commercial radio? Is there a difference between the way you and your parents listen to radio other than the type of music? What and why? How did Clear Channel (now iHeart Radio) change the industry? Do think this change was for the better or worse? Why?
What songs are you tired of hearing on the radio? Is there enough choice of music/artists on radio today? If you could control a radio station, what would its content be, and why? Do you listen to satellite radio? Is it any better?

Summative Forensic Case Report

*Imagine you have been hired as a consultant to conduct risk assessment in six separate domains of forensic psychology: mental health/diminished capacity, offender risk assessment, substance abuse potential, trauma symptoms among children, child abuse potential, and violence risk assessment. For each domain, you will be required to develop reports based on their associated scenarios (scenarios are located in each module that contains a milestone). You will need to assess the data sets from the objective tests used in each domain, as well as review the interview information and collateral information for each case, and create a subsequent recommendations report specific to each domain. You will be required to incorporate appropriate ethical guidelines in each of your recommendations reports.*******
I. Mental Health/Diminished Capacity Assessment (Case Scenario 1)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
II. Offender Risk Assessment (Case Scenario 2)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
III. Substance Abuse Potential (Case Scenario 3)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
IV. Trauma Symptoms Among Children (Case Scenario 4)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process. Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process. Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
V. Child Abuse Potential (Case Scenario 5)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
VI. Violence Risk Assessment (Case Scenario 6)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.