postcolonial criticism of the book "Novel Without A Name" by Duong Thu Huong

Explain how you are trying out new ways to see and interpret what you read.
Give details of several postcolonial ideas, questions, or “thinking lenses” that have influenced or changed the ways you in which you see the book.
Provide specific examples from the book to support your interpretation.
Be conscious of audience. Chances are, your reader has never heard of the novel or the theoretical approaches. Provide enough summary of the book to place your ideas and the novel into context for your reader.
Be sure to introduce the Tyson text, bring in the theories and their definitions, and engage with excerpts of the Tyson text to discuss and support your ideas about postcolonialism and how they occur in the novel.

Writing assignment about a “Famous Business Person (other than Bill Gates or Steve Jobs or Donald Trump)”

Writing assignment about a “Famous Business Person (other than Bill Gates or Steve Jobs or Donald Trump)”
Prior to writing your paper, review and implement APA Formatting and Style Examples and the Writing Instructions and Writing Tips in your syllabus. (Remember, this is a research paper based on facts, news, and written reports; it is not about your opinion or interpretation of the topic; do not refer to yourself in anyway).
Choose a famous business person other than Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, or Donald Trump to research and write a two to three-page report about the person and his or her business(es). Your report should include (do not copy this list and paste it into your paper and then proceed to answer these questions like responding to a test; write in paragraph form, but be sure to include all of these items):
History/background
How the person became an entrepreneur or how he or she got his or her start in the industry
What are his or her major achievements
What failures or setbacks did he or she suffer
What is the person’s or his or her businesses’ future outlook
Required: At least four sources – Textbook, three other reliable sources (Wikipedia and Blogs are not reliable sources and may not be used as one of your references). Reliable sources may be books, printed or Internet articles, research studies or reports, or news reports. The textbook is not a required source; however, you must have at least four sources.
Your paper must include the Sideline cover page, in-text citations, and a works cited list.
In your word document,
Click on: Insert (in the options ribbon)
Click on: Cover page (to the left)
Click on: Sideline (you may have to scroll down)
The body of your paper must be at least two full pages, so your completed document will be at least four pages: Sideline cover page, two-full pages of text, works cited page.

You are required to use six sources From course materials at a minimum in your paper

You are required to use six sources From course materials at a minimum in your paper
o These sources must be selected from course materials
– You must provide a bibliography and a consistent citation style of your liking for this
assignment
– In this assignment determine what your thesis will be for the final paper project and clearly
write that thesis for consideration by the instructor
– Once you explain what you’ll be arguing and exploring in the thesis, annotate the six
sources you’ve selected to focus on
o Each annotation is roughly a one-paragraph long critical explanation of certain
aspects of the source that are useful for/connected to the thesis you’ll be arguing. o Ensure you provide a separate paragraph for each annotation
– Complete this assignm

smoking ( effect of smoking to people health and is vaping risk?

Assignment Prompt: Choose a topic related to our course theme (a current global, national or local issue/problem that in some measure connects with your individual college/career goals and interests) and carry out sufficient research on that topic to write an essay.
You will have a lot of independent choices to make in terms of research methods, types of sources (primary, secondary, scholarly, popular, peer review, etc.) depending on your topic. You will also be choosing the best genre, media (to some extent) and have some design options.
Documentation & Basic Logistics: documentation (APA), length (approximately 4000 words), due dates and required minimum number of sources TBA.For Writing A Project Proposal
Topic Proposal Assignment
The purpose of this writing assignment is to help you make use of the writing and thinking you’ve done in developing your own research paper topic.
Task: Write in complete sentences and paragraphs, but don’t worry too much about how this is organized – it should read more like several pages of well-developed notes than as an essay draft. Your proposal should include two separate sections:
• Choose a topic that matters: Follow the suggestions in the Roadmap section of the relevant genre chapter. Tell me what you plan to write about, what you are using as a working thesis, what genre you are considering as best fits with your topic choice and overall plan, and what types of research you will conduct and the kinds of sources you will need. You are free to present any questions you may have within this section as well.
• Consider your rhetorical situation: Answer questions from the Roadmap section of the relevant genre chapter. While you must address your intended Purpose, Audience, Stance, and Context, it will not be necessary to answer the questions under Medium and Design unless they apply to you (if, for instance, you think it may be necessary to include a photograph or other image or hyperlinks in your paper).
Be prepared to do an informal presentation of your topic and rhetorical situation in class.
About two pages in length (12 pt font, double spaced)

reading response

read the link below and answer all the questions with great details
https://umb.umassonline.net/bbcswebdav/pid-3199908-dt-content-rid-25099861_1/courses/B2910-3032/7_Joyce_Olmec_bloodletting.pdf
1. Provide the citation information for the reading:
2. Identify the paper’s main point:
3. Identify two things that the author(s) does to support their main point:
4. Identify two aspects of the reading that stood out to you. These could be points you found interesting, surprising, or something that you didn’t understand. Feel free to paraphrase, include quotes, and/or present specific vocabulary words.

The Positive Thinking Inventory

Student Name: ___________________________ CWID: __________________________
The Positive Thinking Inventory
Indicate how frequently you engage in the thought, feeling, or action described in each statement by rating it from 0-5.
5: Almost Always 2: Sometimes
4: Most of the time 1: Almost never
3: Usually 0: Not relevant; not sure
Statements
1. I know there is a power beyond myself from which I can draw strength. _____
2. I am committed to living my life to high standards and a higher purpose. _____
3. I don’t let my mistakes discourage me. _____
4. I allow people time to reach their own solutions. _____
5. I have the quality of being able to stick to plans and projects. _____
6. I see individual events as part of a great plan. _____
7. I don’t let danger or crisis paralyze me. _____
8. I keep control over my emotions. _____
9. I tell the truth. _____
10. I don’t let doubt affect my pursuit of a worthy goal. _____
11. I rise to the occasion when goals seem out of reach. _____
12. I keep my eye on my goals, even through daily distractions. _____
13. I speak up on behalf of unpopular positions if I think they have merit. _____
14. I use the same standards of measuring my own behavior as the behaviors of others.
_____
15. I make a conscious effort to react evenly. _____
16. I wake up feeling excited about the day ahead. _____
17. I react to stress with self-control. _____
18. I thrive on finding needs that interest me and fulfilling them. _____
19. I stay in touch with my goals. _____
20. I take on assignments that interest me even when the odds of a favorable outcome as slim.
_____
21. I meet challenges with a sense of control. _____
22. I stay on course even when things get uncertain. _____
23. I make sure fear and feelings of inferiority don’t drive my actions. _____
24. I don’t allow anxiety over an outcome to rattle my composure. _____
25. I concentrate my energy where it will do the most good. _____
26. I am able to control my worries and resentments. _____
27. I summon up the energy needed to see a job through. _____
28. I act with a sense of hope about what lies ahead. _____
29. I contribute to the group’s morale even under difficult circumstances. _____
30. I practice affirming myself in my skills and my outlook. _____
31. I show energy about projects that excite others. _____
32. I create a mental plan to get a task done. _____
33. I move forward decisively. _____
34. I have a clear picture of where I want to be in my life. _____
35. I don’t obsess over an issue. _____
36. I work to minimize the impact of my doubts and fears. _____
37. I don’t act or speak hastily without considering the consequences. _____
38. I don’t cop out hoping others will get the job done. _____
39. I avoid gossiping about others. _____
40. I gear myself to be positively hopeful in my attitudes and expectations. _____
41. I keep my spirits up even when things aren’t going well. _____
42. I don’t allow worry to get the best of me. _____
43. I’m not form the “let’s just be done with it” school of fast solutions. _____
44. I’m energetic in pursing outcomes. _____
45. I engage in those activities that are necessary to meet my goals. _____
46. I get a kick out of life. _____
47. I treat people evenhandedly and fairly. _____
48. I do not allow my fears to set my goals. _____
49. I don’t engage in playing off one person against another. _____
50. I do not panic when adversity occurs. _____
SCORING
Optimism: Enthusiasm: Belief: Integrity:
21 _____ 16 _____ 1 _____ 9 _____
28 _____ 18 _____ 2 _____ 14 _____
36 _____ 31 _____ 6 _____ 39 _____
40 _____ 44 _____ 30 _____ 47 _____
41 _____ 46 _____ 42 _____ 49 _____
Total _____ Total _____ Total _____ Total _____
Courage: Confidence: Determination: Patience:
7 _____ 3 _____ 5 _____ 4 _____
13 _____ 10 _____ 11 _____ 15 _____
20 _____ 17 _____ 27 _____ 24 _____
22 _____ 23 _____ 32 _____ 37 _____
29 _____ 33 _____ 38 _____ 43 _____
Total _____ Total _____ Total _____ Total _____
Calmness: Focus:
8 _____ 12 _____
26 _____ 19 _____
35 _____ 25 _____
48 _____ 34 _____
50 _____ 45 _____
Total _____ Total _____
Scoring Interpretation
A total score of 20 or ABOVE = considered high
An item score ABOVE 3 = considered high
Total score of LESS than 19 should be investigated.
Any item score of LESS than 3 should be investigated.

Summative Forensic Case Report

Imagine you have been hired as a consultant to conduct risk assessment in six separate domains of forensic psychology: mental health/diminished capacity, offender risk assessment, substance abuse potential, trauma symptoms among children, child abuse potential, and violence risk assessment. For each domain, you will be required to develop reports based on their associated scenarios (scenarios are located in each module that contains a milestone). You will need to assess the data sets from the objective tests used in each domain, as well as review the interview information and collateral information for each case, and create a subsequent recommendations report specific to each domain. You will be required to incorporate appropriate ethical guidelines in each of your recommendations reports.*******
I. Mental Health/Diminished Capacity Assessment (Case Scenario 1)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
II. Offender Risk Assessment (Case Scenario 2)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
III. Substance Abuse Potential (Case Scenario 3)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
IV. Trauma Symptoms Among Children (Case Scenario 4)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process. Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process. Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
V. Child Abuse Potential (Case Scenario 5)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
VI. Violence Risk Assessment (Case Scenario 6)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.

The final project for this course is the evaluation of treatment programs addressing three different populations: non-violent offenders

The final project for this course is the evaluation of treatment programs addressing three different populations: non-violent offenders (e.g., drug-related charges), violent offenders (e.g., assault), and trauma victims (, victims of abuse, assault, rape, etc.) for the purpose of informing family or criminal court decisions (e.g., family reunification, jail diversion) for each of the target populations. In this project, you will summarize forensic psychology treatment literature from the last five years for each of the populations. Based on your literature review, you will evaluate treatment programs for their efficacy, legal admissibility, and feasibility, as well as their compliance with ethical guidelines and federal laws. Finally, you will include an aftercare plan for each target population.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Literature Review: Summarize forensic psychological treatment literature from the last five years for each of the target populations. What are the most common psychological concerns among each population? Are these concerns specific to populations within the legal system, or do they share common concerns with other populations? Which treatments have been particularly effective in meeting the needs of each of the target populations? Are there treatments that have been effective in the general population that might benefit the target populations, but are not admissible or feasible given the constraints of the legal system?
a) Non-violent offenders
b) Violent offenders
c) Trauma victims
II. Legal and Ethical Considerations
a) Compare and contrast ethical concerns related to the treatment of each of the target populations. For example, what ethical concerns do
psychologists face in treating each of the target populations within the constraints of the legal system? Are there special considerations in addressing victims versus those who are incarcerated, or violent versus non-violent offenders? Are there certain ethical principles that apply to all three populations? Be sure to substantiate your claims with specific examples and guidelines from a professional psychology organization.
b) Discuss how the specific ethical guidelines of a professional psychology organization may have informed the treatment strategies for each of the three populations. Be sure to substantiate your claims with specific examples.
c) Compare and contrast federal laws related to the treatment of each of the target populations. How do these laws inform or constrain care options? Be sure to substantiate your claims with specific examples.
d) Assess the impact of U.S. Supreme Court cases on the development and implementation of treatment programs for each of the target populations. How do these cases inform or constrain care options? Be sure to substantiate your claims with specific examples.
1. Non-violent offenders
2. Violent offenders
3. Trauma victims
III. Aftercare Plan: Now that you have had a chance to evaluate various treatment plans for their efficacy and feasibility, recommend appropriate aftercare plans for each of the target populations. In other words, discuss where the subject will be going and what the subject will be doing upon discharge, release, or completion of care. Be sure to justify your recommendations with specific research.
a) Non-violent offenders
b) Violent offenders
c) Trauma victims

The supplement to Chapter 5 in your textbook describes and develops several decision trees.

The supplement to Chapter 5 in your textbook describes and develops several decision trees. In a 4-5 page paper, not including the cover and reference pages, develop a decision tree for the case described. Explain the process of developing a decision tree; draw the decision tree (include the decision tree in an appendix showing chance nodes, probabilities, outcomes, expected values, and net expected value); and defend your final decision based on your decision tree.
Case for consideration—An operations manager for a cereal producer is faced with a choice of:
A large-scale investment (A) to purchase a new cooker which could produce a substantial pay-off in terms of increased revenue net of costs but requires an investment of 3,750,000 Saudi Riyal. After extensive market research it is thought that there is a 40% chance that a pay-off of 9,375,000 Saudi Riyal will be realized, but there is a 60% chance that it will be only 3,000,000 Saudi Riyal.
A smaller scale project (B) to refurbish an existing cooker. At 1,875,000 Saudi Riyal, this option is less costly but produces a lower pay-off. Again, extensive research data suggests a 30% chance of a gain of 3,750,000 Saudi Riyal but a 70% chance of it being only 1,875,000 Saudi Riyal.
Continuing the present operation without change (C) which cost nothing, but produces no pay-off.
Be sure to use at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed references in supporting your answer. Current sources are those published within the most recent five-year period, and scholarly sources are those from peer-reviewed journals.
Make certain for each listed reference that you have at least one supporting citation in the body of your content. Your reference page is always the last page of the submission where all individual references get listed. The Saudi Digital Library is a good resource to search for these references. Submit your presentation into the Assignment Dropbox.
It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the TurnItIn Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check tool, review the TurnItIn Originality Check – Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.